Quick Home Search

Sunday, December 13, 2009

The Basics: Extended Home Buyer Tax Credit 2009/2010

Bringing the Dream of Homeownership Within Reach

As part of its plan to stimulate the U.S. housing market and address the economic challenges facing our nation, Congress has passed new legislation that:

  • Extends the First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit of up to $8,000 to first-time home buyers until April 30, 2010.
  • Expands the credit to grant up to $6,500 credit to current home owners purchasing a new or existing home between November 7, 2009 and April 30, 2010.
Here is more information about how the Extended Home Buyer Tax Credit can help prospective home buyers become part of the American dream. If you have specific questions or need additional information, please contact a tax professional or the Internal Revenue Service at 800-829-1040.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Senate May Approve Tax Credit Wednesday

The U.S. House and Senate are close to an agreement to extend the home buyer tax credit due to expire at the end of this month.

The Senate is expected to vote Wednesday while the House could approve it later in the week – likely before Friday when the monthly report on the unemployment rate will be released.

The measure that is slated to pass would cover homes under contract by April 30. Also, anyone taking the credit from a home purchased in 2010 would be able to take the credit when they pay their 2009 taxes.

First-time home buyers would be eligible for $8,000, but purchasers don’t have to be first-time buyers. Anyone who has owned a home for at least five years could get a $6,500 credit on a new residence.

Income limitations rise under the new plan with individuals earning up to $125,000 a year and couples earning up to $225,000 eligible. People who earn more would be eligible for smaller credits.

Source: The New York Times, Jackie Calmes (11/4/2009)

Friday, October 16, 2009

NEW CALIFORNIA LAWS FOR 2009-10 AFFECTING REALTORS®

The conclusion of the first half of the 2009-10 legislative session has brought many new laws that may affect California REALTORS® and their clients. Not surprisingly in the subprime aftermath, prominently featured among the new laws is stricter regulation of the mortgage lending industry. To view the full text and legislative summary of any of the following new bills, go to www.leginfo.ca.gov.
  • REO Buyer Can Select Escrow and Title: Effective October 11, 2009, the Buyer's Choice Act prohibits an REO lender selling residential property up to four units from directly or indirectly requiring the buyer to purchase escrow services or title insurance from any particular company. A buyer, however, who has received written notice of the right to make an independent selection, may agree to the REO lender's escrow or title recommendations. An REO lender that violates this law can be held liable for three times the charges the buyer incurred, whereas a violation by the seller's agent may be subject to license disciplinary action. This law expires on January 1, 2015. Assembly Bill 957.
  • No Advance Fee Loan Modifications: Starting October 11, 2009, a new law prohibits anyone from claiming any compensation for negotiating or arranging a loan modification until after that person fully performs each and every service as promised. Aimed at combating loan modification scams, this ban applies to upfront fees collected by real estate agents and attorneys. The ban expires on January 1, 2013. Also effective immediately, anyone who negotiates or arranges a loan modification must give the borrower a specified notice that paying a third-party for loan modification services is unnecessary. These new requirements apply to mortgage loans secured by residential property up to four units, with certain exceptions for lenders and loan servicers acting on their own behalf. Violations can be penalized by, among other things, a $10,000 fine plus one-year imprisonment for individuals, or a $50,000 fine for businesses. Real estate brokers with existing Advance Fee Loan Modification Agreements reviewed by the Department of Real Estate (DRE) can no longer, as of October 11, 2009, enter into these agreements or collect advance fees. Agreements entered into and advance fees collected before October 11, 2009 are not affected. For the DRE announcement, go to http://www.dre.ca.gov/pdf_docs/SB94WebAnnouncement(brokers).pdf. Senate Bill 94.
  • Advance Fee Redefined: Aside from loan modifications discussed above, Senate Bill 94 also broadens the definition of an advance fee which must be specially handled by real estate agents, such as by submitting an advance fee agreement for DRE review and placing funds received into a broker's trust account. Under the new definition that took effect on October 11, 2009, agents cannot separate advance fees or services into components to avoid the advance fee requirements. More specifically, an advance fee is now defined as "a fee, regardless of the form, claimed, demanded, charged, received, or collected by a licensee from a principal before fully completing each and every service the licensee contracted to perform, or represented would be performed." Exceptions include advertisements in newspapers of general circulation, tenant prescreening fees, and tenant security deposits. Senate Bill 94.
  • Mortgage Loan Originators Regulated: Beginning in December 2010, a real estate licensee acting as mortgage loan originator must obtain a license endorsement, which entails education, written testing, and reporting requirements. A mortgage loan originator is anyone who, for compensation or gain, takes a mortgage loan application or offers or negotiates terms of a mortgage loan for residential property containing one-to-four units. Exemptions include real estate agents who only engage in selling, buying, or leasing activities, unless compensated by a lender or mortgage loan originator. This license endorsement requirement comports with the creation of a Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry under recent federal law. Finance lenders and residential mortgage lenders under the Department of Corporation must also register in the nationwide system. Additionally, if a real estate broker or the broker's salesperson makes, arranges, or services loans secured by residential property containing one-to-four units, the broker must notify the DRE by January 31, 2010 or within 30 days of commencing such loan activity, whichever is later. Senate Bill 36.
  • Mortgage Broker Activities Restricted: Commencing January 1, 2010, a mortgage broker will be deemed a fiduciary with a duty to place the borrower's economic interest above his or her own. This fiduciary duty pertains to a mortgage broker who makes loans secured by residential property of one-to-four units. Also starting January 1, 2010, the law will strictly regulate higher-priced mortgage loans as defined, including requiring upfront disclosure if a mortgage broker only arranges higher-priced mortgage loans, restricting prepayment penalties and yield spread premiums, prohibiting negative amortization, and prohibiting mortgage brokers from steering borrowers to higher-cost loans. Assembly Bill 260.
  • Appraisal Industry Oversight: The Office of Real Estate Appraisers (OREA) will have regulatory oversight of appraisal management companies, which gained prominence after Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac adopted the Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC). Starting January 1, 2010, the OREA must implement a registration system for appraisal management companies, including fingerprinting and background checks for persons with operational authority as defined. On a separate note, this law clarifies what conduct constitutes improperly influencing the appraisal process by anyone with an interest in a real estate transaction. Such prohibited conduct includes withholding or threatening to withhold an appraisal fee, withholding or threatening to withhold future appraisal business, and promising future business, promotions, or compensation. Senate Bill 237.
  • Mortgage Fraud Becomes a State Crime: As of January 1, 2010, anyone who deliberately makes any misrepresentation or omission during the mortgage lending process with the intent of influencing that process will be guilty of mortgage fraud under California law. A violation of this law is a crime punishable by one-year imprisonment. Under existing federal law, loan fraud against a federally-insured lender is a crime punishable by a $1 million fine, plus one-year imprisonment (18 U.S.C. section 1014). Senate Bill 239.
  • Increase in Homestead Exemptions: Coming into effect on January 1, 2010, the homestead exemption protecting a homeowner's equity from judgment creditors has been increased by $25,000 across the board to $75,000 for individuals, $100,000 for married couples or family units as specified, and $175,000 for persons over 65 years, disabled, or over 55 years with limited income as specified. Assembly Bill 1046.
  • 60-Day Notice to Terminate Tenants Extended: Existing law generally requiring a 60-day notice to terminate a month-to-month residential tenant, which was originally slated to sunset on January 1, 2010, has been extended indefinitely. A 30-day notice to terminate is sufficient if the tenant has lived in the property for less than one year, or if the landlord has sold the property and certain requirements are met as specified in our standard-form Notice of Termination of Tenancy (C.A.R. Form NTT). The 60-day notice requirement does not apply to fixed-term leases, such as a one-year lease. Other laws address tenants in properties foreclosed upon. Senate Bill 290.

Other Significant Laws: Other new laws that may interest REALTORS® include, without limitation, the following:

  • Landlord Utilities: Requires certain utility companies to notify residential tenants of landlord's past due accounts and upcoming shutoffs, and allows tenants to begin service in their own names and deduct payment from rent (Senate Bill 120).
  • Mobilehome Parks: Prohibits management from requiring a homeowner to use a specific broker or dealer when replacing a mobilehome or manufactured home on a space in a mobilehome park (Senate Bill 804).
  • Swimming Pools: Requires anti-entrapment devices for owners of apartment buildings, condominium complexes, and others, including the filing of compliance statements (Assembly Bill 1020).
  • Mechanic's Liens: Provides new procedures, including service of a Notice of Mechanic's Lien to the owner and mandatory recording of a lis pendens when enforcing a mechanic's lien (Assembly Bill 457).
  • Low Water-Using Plants: Renders unenforceable any HOA provision prohibiting landscaping with water-efficient plants in common interest developments (Assembly Bill 1061).
  • Reverse Mortgages: Provides new disclosure and other requirements under the Reverse Mortgage Elder Protection Act (Assembly Bill 329).
  • Disposal of Records: Shields from liability businesses that dispose of abandoned records containing personal information by shredding or erasing, and gives a legal presumption that a tenant owns records remaining on the premises after tenancy termination (Assembly Bill 1094).
  • Plumbing Fixtures: Provides new disclosure and other requirements for water-conserving plumbing fixtures effective on or after January 1, 2014 (Senate Bill 407).

Saturday, August 8, 2009

The Basics: 2009 First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit

Bringing the Dream of Homeownership Within Reach

As part of its plan to stimulate the U.S. housing market and address the economic challenges facing our nation, Congress has passed legislation that grants a tax credit of up to $8,000 to first-time home buyers.

Here is more information about how the 2009 First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit can help prospective home buyers become part of the American dream.
Breaking news: Tax Credit Can Be Used on Closing Costs.

Who Qualifies?

First-time home buyers who purchase homes between January 1, 2009 and December 1, 2009.
To qualify as a “first-time home buyer” the purchaser or his/her spouse may not have owned a residence during the three years prior to the purchase.

Which Properties Are Eligible?

The 2009 First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit may be applied to primary residences, including: single-family homes, condos, townhomes, and co-ops.

How Much Will the Credit Be?

The maximum allowable credit for home buyers is $8,000. Each home buyer’s tax credit is determined by two factors:

The price of the home—the credit is equal to 10% of the purchase price of the home, up to $8,000.

The buyer's income—single buyers with incomes up to $75,000 and married couples with incomes up to $150,000—may receive the maximum tax credit.

If the Buyer(s)’ Income Exceeds These Limits, Can He/She Still Get a Credit?

Yes, some buyers may still be eligible for the credit.The credit decreases for buyers who earn between $75,000 and $95,000 for single buyers and between $150,000 and $170,000 for home buyers filing jointly. The amount of the tax credit decreases as his/her income approaches the maximum limit. Home buyers earning more than the maximum qualifying income—over $95,000 for singles and over $170,000 for couples are not eligible for the credit.

Will the Tax Credit Need to Be Repaid?

No. The buyer does not need to repay the tax credit, if he/she occupies the home for three years or more. However, if the property is sold during the three-year period, the credit will be recouped on the sale.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

C.A.R. reports sales increased 20.1 percent, price declined 26.4 percent

C.A.R. reports sales increased 20.1 percent, price declined 26.4 percentHome sales increased 20.1 percent in June in California compared with the same period a year ago, while the median price of an existing home declined 26.4 percent, according to a C.A.R. report released Monday. “Many first-time buyers, especially those who were previously priced out of certain areas, are realizing that tax credits from both the state and federal governments, increased affordability, and low interest rates are creating a prime time to purchase a home,” said C.A.R. President James Liptak. “June marked the 10th consecutive month of positive sales gains, and the fourth month of rising median home prices. The statewide median price for existing condos increased for the third consecutive month in June, while sales climbed 27 percent compared with last year. Both of these trends are indicative of increased interest in condos on the part of first-time and other buyers.”

Closed escrow sales of existing, single-family detached homes in California totaled 514,110 in June at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate, according to information collected by C.A.R. from more than 90 local REALTOR® associations statewide. Statewide home resale activity increased 20.1 percent from the revised 427,910 sales pace recorded in June 2008. Sales in June 2009 decreased 6 percent compared with the previous month. The statewide sales figure represents what the total number of homes sold during 2009 would be if sales maintained the June pace throughout the year. It is adjusted to account for seasonal factors that typically influence home sales.

The median price of an existing, single-family detached home in California during June 2009 was $274,740, a 26.4 percent decrease from the revised $373,100 median for June 2008, C.A.R. reported. The June 2009 median price rose 4.2 percent compared with May’s $263,600 median price.

Monday, July 27, 2009

Easy Ways to Improve Curb Appeal

Curb appeal can make or break a sale in today’s market.

If your sellers are willing to improve the outside of their homes, here are some low-cost ways to increase a home’s curb appeal.

  1. Clean up beds by weeding and pruning shrubs. Add mulch for a high-end look.
  2. Invest in pots. A couple of attractive ceramic (or ceramic look-alike) pots filled with attractive plants can really make an entrance look classier.
  3. Install landscape lighting on the path to the front door.
  4. Replace the mailbox with a newer one and put some nice plantings at its base to dress it up.
Source: Tribune Media Services, Cameron Huddleston (07/26/2009)

Read More

6 Landscaping Tricks That Wow Buyers
More Articles on Boosting Curb Appeal
Blog: Styled, Staged & Sold!

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

One of the greatest areas of uncertainty among REALTORS® is in the determination of the proper listing status in the context of short sale transactions. This pervasive uncertainty is no doubt attributable in large part to an industry wide lack of experience in short sale transactions given a decade of artificially inflated sales due to subprime lending and the ease of credit. This brief article is intended as a primer for those entering the short sale market as well as a refresher for those already experienced in short sale transactions. To fully understand the reason for short sale transactions, we should briefly discuss the concept of foreclosure of real estate property.

Types of Foreclosure In California there are two types of foreclosure with which a home owner might be faced. These are the “judicial foreclosure” and the “trustee sale” (sometimes called the “power of sale” foreclosure). In a judicial foreclosure, where the amount recovered in the sale is less than the amount owed on a loan, the difference is called a “deficiency.” A “deficiency judgment” is a judgment against the borrower for the difference between the unpaid balance on the loan and the amount generated by the foreclosure sale or the fair market value, whichever is greater. Where the foreclosure is accomplished by judicial action, the lender may be able to obtain a deficiency judgment against the borrower. However, the recovery of the deficiency amount is only available in a judicial foreclosure and is not permitted after a “trustee’s sale.” In other words, if the lender utilizes the non-judicial method of a trustee sale, a deficiency cannot be collected. Additionally, the recovery of a deficiency is not possible on a “purchase money” loan, including seller-carried financing, on any real property or loans on property consisting of 1 4 family units of owner-occupied residential property. (The term “purchase money” loan refers to a loan where 100% of the proceeds of the loan went for the purchase of the home. A refinance of a loan, for example, ordinarily destroys the “purchase money” characterization since the loan proceeds from a refinance are not used to purchase the home. There are exceptions which are beyond the scope of this brief article.) Recovery of the deficiency amount is possible, however, on a refinanced property loan (non purchase money) or on a 1-4 family non-owner occupied residential property loan.

Short Sales

“Short sales” may occur once a home is in foreclosure but before the property goes to sale. In a short sale, the lender accepts an offer from a third party buyer for less than the outstanding loan on the property and forgives the deficiency owed by the borrower. This arrangement may be appealing to lenders because it saves time and money by stopping the legal foreclosure process and by taking the property off the lender’s books. However, it has come to light that some lenders agreeing to short sales are including language in the release which allows them to sue on the note even though they are releasing the security in the property. It is questionable whether the courts will allow these lenders to sue on the note after a short sale though at this time there is no appellate court has addressed the issue in the context of residential foreclosures.

Until December 21, 2007, if the lender accepted less than the balance owed and cancelled the debt, that amount would be considered debt forgiveness, and tax would be due on the amount forgiven. This forgiven amount was called “phantom income” and was treated as part of the gross income by the IRS. Lenders reported the forgiven amount to the IRS on form 1099. According to the IRS it is the same as if the borrower received that amount of income. On December 21, 2007, President Bush signed H.R.3648: Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, which provides relief to certain homeowners facing foreclosure from the phantom income realized from debt forgiveness or foreclosure. The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act generally applies to “purchase money” loans on property consisting of 1 4 family units of owner occupied residential property. The Act also applies to funds from a refinance loan used to construct or improve a primary residence up to the amount of the mortgage principal remaining, just prior to refinancing.

Which Option is Best for Your Client When Facing Foreclosure There are a number of reasons a home owner may prefer a short sale to a foreclosure. For example, where the loan is recourse, meaning that the lender may be entitled to a deficiency judgment against the homeowner, a short sale may be a way of eliminating that risk. Although judicial foreclosures constitute less than five percent of all residential foreclosures in California, many borrowers prefer the security and peace of mind of working out a resolution rather than allowing the property to be taken by foreclosure.

A second reason that a borrower would prefer a short sale to a foreclosure is that it may be easier to obtain credit after a short sale than after a foreclosure. While there is some dispute in the lending industry, it appears that obtaining credit is more difficult after a foreclosure than a short sale. According to the Fannie Mae latest credit guidelines, the earliest a borrower can obtain credit to purchase another home is five years to seven years after the foreclosure sale. Where the borrower can show extenuating circumstances, the length of time may be reduced to three years. In contrast, the earliest a borrower may obtain credit after a short sale is two years after the sale date. Thus, the ability to obtain credit to purchase another home, according to Fannie Mae guidelines, is restored much earlier where the property is sold in a short sale compared to when the property goes to foreclosure.

The determination of which option is best for a client facing foreclosure is the subject for someone fully informed of the intricacies of California foreclosure law. The incorrect advice can cost a client tremendously both financially and emotionally; and if an agent has provided his client incorrect or incomplete information which leads to the wrong decision, the cost can be shifted to the agent or his insurance provider by prosecuting a claim against that agent. For that reason, most of the attorneys on the CAR Strategic Defense Panel advise agents and brokers to refer every client facing imminent foreclosure to an attorney for a full explanation of the foreclosure process and the options available to the client. We also recommend that REALTORS® document this referral by sending a confirming letter and keeping it in the file as proof that this advice was given. Maintaining a detailed transaction log delineating all conversations and events is a “best practice” to be followed. This would be tremendously helpful should a client ever claim that a REALTOR® provided incorrect advice. Even if the client ignores advice to seek legal counsel, most courts will determine that the REALTOR® has discharged his or her duty if he or she can show that the client was referred to an attorney for legal counseling. In so doing, a REALTOR® is removing potential liability and placing it on the shoulders of the attorney to whom the client is referred.

Proper Use of the MLS in Short Sale Transactions

Rule 7.1 of the CARETS Rules and Regulations requires that every listing placed in the service by a participant comply with the Rules of the MLS. Rule 7.19 sets forth the rules pertaining to expiration, extension and renewal of listings. Rule 8.3 imposes an obligation on the listing participant to utilize good faith in assuring that the listing is accurate to the best of his or her knowledge and belief. Rule 10 of the Rules and Regulations sets forth the applicable statuses of listings in the MLS. (It is important to note that not all MLS Rules and Regulations provide for these same statuses. The statuses below are applicable to the CARETS’ MLS Rules and Regulations. If you are not a member of CARETS, you should consult the Rules and Regulations of your MLS to determine which statuses are available.) Those statuses include the following:

On Market Status:

On Market status refers to listings where a listing contract is in force and the property is available for offers.

Active Status:

(A) Where no offer has been received the listing is in Active (A) status. Back-up Status (B): Where an offer has been received and accepted and the seller is accepting backup offers or where an offer has been accepted that is subject to third party approval, the property is in Back-up (B) status.

Off Market Status:

Rule 10 of the MLS Rules and Regulations provides for seven different Off Market statuses.

These are as follows:

Hold Status (H):

The Hold (H) status applies where there is a listing contract in place but the seller has for some reason requested that the property not be shown.

Withdrawn (W):

The Withdrawn (W) status applies where there is a listing agreement still in place but the property is no longer being marketed.

Pending (P):

This status applies when an offer has been accepted and the Seller is no longer soliciting offers through the MLS.

Canceled (C):

The Canceled (C) status applies when a listing has been canceled.

Expired (X):

This status is applicable when the time of the listing has expired and has not been renewed.

Sold (S):

Sold (S) status applies when the listed property has been sold and escrow has closed.

Leased (L):

The Leased (L) status is used when the property has been leased.

What is the Appropriate Status for a Short Sale Listing?

Depending upon the circumstances, a short sale listing could fall into one of several different listings statuses. In the ordinary course of a short sale listing, the following would be the statuses:

Active (A): At the time of listing the property, it would be in Active (A) status unless for some reason the Seller entered into a listing contract with the agent then advised that it should not be listed. In that situation the listing would immediately go into Hold (H) or Withdrawn (W) status depending upon the wishes of the Seller, until the Seller decides how to proceed with the transaction either On Market or Off Market.

Back Up (B): In the ordinary course of short sale transactions, the property will proceed into Back Up (B) status if an offer is made on the property. This is because in a short sale transaction, the lender has to approve the offer before it is deemed accepted. Thus, the offer is accepted contingent upon the acceptance by a third party, the lender.

It is important to remember that Rule 10.2 requires that accepted offers be reported to the MLS or input into the data base as “pending” or “back-up” within 48 hours. Where the property is sold in a short sale transaction, upon final closing of escrow the broker must report or input the status change within 48 hours. At that time the status would be Sold (S).

Remarks in MLS A common question among REALTORS® is whether there should be a comment in the Remarks section of the MLS stating that the property is a short sale listing. Is this a critical piece of information that must be disclosed to the Buyer? Arguably it is a matter required to be disclosed pursuant to Article 2 of the NAR Code of Ethics as well as the disclosure requirements of Civil Code §2079(a). On the one hand, knowledge that the property is being offered as a short sale could affect the price the Buyer is willing to pay, thereby bringing offers lower than one might expect. On other hand, knowledge that the property is being offered as a short sale could result in more offers as Buyers try to take advantage of a bargain. This condition demonstrates the elasticity of demand relative to price. Please keep in mind that the CAR Short Sale Listing Agreement (SSL) includes at paragraph 5 a provision that the Seller authorizes the agent to advertise in the MLS and other advertising medium and that the property transfer, payment of commissions and sales price are subject to lender approval. Thus, an agent using the CAR SSL, which is highly recommended, has authorization to disclose in the MLS that the sale is subject to lender approval.

Not only is the Buyer affected by remarks in the MLS concerning the fact that the property is a short sale, but this is also a matter of concern to the cooperating agent who is being offered a commission relative to the selling price. Not infrequently, the lender in a short sale transaction requests the listing agent to take a commission reduction in order to “make the deal work.” While NAR has provided guidance for addressing the prohibition on contingent offers of commission, it is still a matter of interest to cooperating agents because the short sale transaction is more precarious and time consuming than a normal sale transaction. This may affect the cooperating agent’s decision whether to spend a substantial amount of time pursuing the short sale transaction. Therefore, the fact that it is a short sale should always be disclosed in the confidential broker/agent remarks or the listing agent may be required to absorb any lien holder reductions in commission.
Conclusion The real estate industry is evolving rapidly with changes occurring on a daily basis. To keep pace with this rapidly changing environment, it is imperative that the agent have a working knowledge of the MLS rules and regulations and an understanding of how they impact offers to sell real estate and offers of commission. Not only is a thorough knowledge of the MLS necessary for an efficient exchange of information between REALTORS®, but lack of knowledge is one of the primary reasons for claims against agents. For this reason, REALTORS® are encouraged to familiarize themselves thoroughly with the MLS Rules and Regulations.

Information provided by the law offices of Giardinelli & Duke, APCwww.gdlawoffices.com